|
Along
with publishing books of natal charts,
Renaissance astrologers
also made advances in new astrological techniques as well. There were a number of new
or more widely
publicized house systems such as the Campanus and
Regiomantanus
systems. New
ephemerides were compiled,
increasing the accuracy of chart creation.
Copernicus,
who discovered Heliocentric Astronomy, made a major contribution to
astrology
by publishing Erasmus Reinhold in
1551. This work
published new tables
called Prutenic Tables, which greatly aided astrologers in the accuracy
of
their computations.
Johann
Kepler,
known today as an astronomer, was also an astrologer.
In 1627 he published the Rudolphine
Tables which further improved the accuracy of
astrological prediction and delineation.
By
the early 16th
century, astrology was enjoying an unrivalled popularity. The Church viewed it in a
favorable light,
even Pope Gregory XIII,
who had a
distrust of it, allowed his natal chart to be cast.
That very chart has been preserved in
the
Vatican Library. Other
Popes, such as
Leo X and Paul
III
gladly endorsed astrology.
Some
who could afford to do so,
were said to not even take a step outside without first consulting
their
astrologer. Among
these, were Catherine
de Medici, whose
astrologers
included Michel de Nostradamus. Even the coronation of
Elizabeth I of England, on January
15, 1559 at precisely noon,
had been
carefully selected by her court astrologer, Dr.
John Dee.
Even
the not so wealthy could
gain the wisdom of the famous astrologers.
Due to the availability of printing,
inexpensive almanacs were being
produced for the masses.
Typically
these almanacs contained a calendar
of the
year, astronomical events such as solar and lunar eclipses, as well as
astrological predictions. The
wealthy,
and high born had been getting this information for a long time, now
just about
anyone could obtain it.
By
the mid 17th
century, English astrologer William Lilly
was publishing an annual almanac titled Merlinus Anglicus
(the English
Merlin). It had an
estimated annual
circulation of 30,000 copies.
The
total
number of almanacs printed in England during this time exceeded the
total
number of Bibles printed. It
was
estimated that up to one third of all English households had at least
one
astrological almanac.
At
the height of his popularity,
Lilly was seeing 2000 clients each year.
While many were the well to do, his
workbooks,
which are held at the Ashmolean
Museum at Oxford University, show that fully a third of his clients
were listed
as ancilla (female servant).
While
the expected questions of romance, and
business were the most
frequent questions, Lilly used Horary astrology to answer a much
broader spectrum
of questions. These
included everything
from health to truth or falsity of rumors, buried treasure to which
spouse
would die first, gender of a child and Witchcraft.
The Other Side of The Coin
Even
with its popularity among
all classes of Europe, astrology had its detractors, and its fair share
of
criticism. The
Catholic Church was never
really comfortable with the Spiritual/Magical nature of astrology,
especially
where it might be contrary to established doctrine.
Specifically,
the Church voiced concern over
the perceived implication that, if in fact the stars absolutely
determined all
actions, then astrology denied man's free will.
Some
pointed out that the stars
and their movements were created by God, and therefore astrology was
simply
giving man a tool to see God’s Will.
They also pointed out that while certain
events may be predestined, that
didn’t mean that a person’s entire life was.
Astrology
didn’t always say “this will
happen”, most of the time it
said, “The best time for this to happen is at this time”. Knowing this
didn’t
remove
free will, it simply allowed a person to know opportune timings for
action.
Disputations
against
Divinatory Astrology published in 1496 by Giovanni Pico della
Mirandola,
detailed problems with astrological theory and technique. It condemned the denial of
free will that
Mirandola saw in current astrological practice. Interestingly enough,
the date
of Mirandola's death was predicted accurately by a Renaissance
astrologer,
Anthony Grafton.
In
1586 Pope Sixtus V
issued a papal bull that condemned all forms of magic and divination. This included horary,
electional and natal
astrology. While
some astrologers, such
as Italian Jerome Cardan, were
held
under house arrest by the Inquisition on suspicion of violating the
papal bull,
others such as William Lilly in England, seem to have avoided
prosecution. Of course, Elizabethan
England was much more tolerant of such things.
The Great Conjunction of 1524
In
February 1524, astrologers
announced that there would be both a Great Conjunction of Jupiter and
Saturn,
and a conjunction of all the ancient planets in the sign of Pisces. The reaction of this news
caused turbulence
of historical proportion.
The
wide availability of print
allowed almost anyone to read the wild predictions such a significant
event
might cause. Because
the conjunction was
to happen in a water sign, most predictions centered around flooding. This included speculation
of inundations of
Biblical proportion as had happened in the time of Noah.
Other,
more sober analysis of the
charts predicted an abundance of rain and snow, but nothing more. According to a
meteorological diary kept by a
Bolognese astrologer, it was in fact a wetter than normal year.
Controversy
also centered over
the use of the Great Conjunctions of Saturn and Jupiter as a technique
of
prediction. This
was criticized as an
Arabic technique that had replaced the older Ptolemaic use of eclipses.
There
were a number of
treatises decrying not
only the reliance on Great Conjunctions, but the use of solar
revolutions also.
Neither of these had been set forth in Ptolemy’s Tetrabiblos. Even so, while
there was a trend toward the Ptolemaic practices, most astrologers
continued to
use the techniques that had come down from the Arab Era.
It
should be noted that modern
astrological software reveals that the Great Conjunction of Saturn and
Jupiter
took place on January 30, 1524 before all of the seven planets were
together in
Pisces.
On
February 13, 1524 Mercury entered Pisces so that all of the
traditional planets were now in Pisces, except for the Moon in Gemini.
On
February 20, 1524 Venus entered Aries with the Moon in Sagittarius.
(Tropical)
Needless
to say, the actual
non-event didn’t live up to the hype, sort of like Y2K.
This caused a general consensus toward
distrust of the astrological sciences.
Masses tend toward hysteria if given a
chance.
It
can be assumed that the
relief of nothing
happening was far over shadowed by the disappointment of all those who
had
wasted time and effort, perhaps on a par with the Great
Disappointment
which lead to the formation of the Seventh Day Adventists in the 19th
century.
Astrology
had been proclaimed the
Queen of the Sciences. It
was thought
capable of providing an explanation for the birth, growth, and decline
of
everything in the material world.
The
zodiac, or Celestial World, was
the key
link in the Great Chain of Being.
It had
acted as the essential intermediary between the Divine world of
Platonic ideas
and angels, and the everyday material world made up of the four
classical
elements of Earth, Air, Fire, and Water.
Astrology
had been seen as a
unifying force, uniting all things in existence.
It was an ancestor and precursor of
Einstein’s
elusive Unified Field Theory.
Disappointment in astrology’s ability to
accurately predict events of even the highest potential significance,
lead
inexorably to its decline.
The
dawn of
the Enlightenment of the 18th century pushed
astrology out of
fashion. The
increasing acceptance of
the mechanical theory of Causality, with observation of empirical
evidence,
overtook the interpretation and calculation of astrology.
With
the movement away from the
Spiritual in favor of the scientific, the more Spiritual and esoteric
sciences
lost favor. Renaissance
science hadn’t
disagreed essentially with religion, it couldn’t.
In the Renaissance, the Church still
held the
power of, and over the people.
As
the
“hard” sciences began to take hold, people started to put their faith
in only
those things that could be observed.
This caused a split between science and
spirituality that is with us
today.
With
the Enlightenment, the Bible
and its stories were no longer Absolute Truth.
They were seen merely as stories and
parables. It was no
longer required
that you believe
the Truth of the stories, as long as you understood the ideas which
they
related.
The
downfall of astrology didn’t
cause the decline of the Church. They were both victims of humankind’s
need and
desire to know the unknowable. Both
had
had their chance to satisfy this hunger, and both had failed.
Unfortunately,
this has caused a
conceptual imbalance. Because
there is
no longer a link between the Spiritual and the Scientific, it has
become inappropriate
for a Biologist to talk to a Theologian and Mystics are dismissed by
Philosophers.
The
pendulum has swung yet again, this time to the other
extreme.
Material
for
this history was taken primarily from “History of Astrology in the Renaissance”
originally published in The Mountain Astrologer, October –
November
2002.
|